Most UK food manufacturers start with Excel. It is free, familiar, and flexible. But BRC Issue 9 Section 2 requires a managed HACCP system with version control, an audit trail, and demonstrable governance — and Excel cannot reliably provide any of these. An auditor can challenge an Excel-based HACCP plan and routinely does.
UK food manufacturers preparing for BRC or SALSA audits who need an immutable audit trail, version control, multi-site governance, and one source of truth — not 14 spreadsheets across five computers.
Very small operations not subject to third-party audit, or businesses still scoping what their HACCP plan should look like before committing to a system.
| SafetyCore | Excel | |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail | Immutable, field-level, timestamped | None — Excel does not track who changed what |
| Version control | Built in — every change recorded | Manual filename versioning (HACCP_v17_FINAL_FINAL.xlsx) |
| Approval workflows | Role-based sign-off with timestamps | None — anyone with access can edit |
| Multi-site consistency | One platform, consistent across every site | Each site has its own spreadsheet |
| BRC Issue 9 alignment | Built around BRC Section 2 requirements | Generic — depends entirely on how you set it up |
| CCP decision tree | Structured Codex decision tree on every hazard | Manual — easy to skip or apply inconsistently |
| PRP integration | Linked to hazard analysis and risk scoring | Usually in a separate document |
| Auditor view | One-click PDF export, ready to present | Print-and-pray |
| Knowledge transfer | Team-based; survives staff turnover | Held by one person who built it |
| Cost | £150/site/month | Free — but consultant fixes cost more |
| Best for | Any UK manufacturer certifying to BRC, SALSA or GFSI | Operations not subject to third-party audit |
It is possible but increasingly difficult. BRC Issue 9 requires a managed system with an audit trail — and Excel does not produce one. Auditors regularly challenge Excel-based HACCP plans on version control, approval evidence, and consistency. Major non-conformances on HACCP documentation are one of the most common BRC findings.
Three risks. First, major non-conformance at audit — which can cost certification. Second, the system depends on one person; if they leave, the business is exposed. Third, audit prep takes 4–8 weeks of scrambling for evidence every cycle. SafetyCore reduces that to hours.
No. Most sites are live within a week. You import your existing hazard analysis and HACCP plan structure into SafetyCore's templates, which already map to Codex CXC 1-1969 and BRC Section 2.
Context: a single day of food safety consultant time costs £600–£1,200 typically. £150 a month is less than a quarter of one consultant day. If SafetyCore prevents one major non-conformance at audit — or one week of audit prep panic — it pays for itself within a year.
Full access. No credit card. UK-hosted. BRC Issue 9 aligned.
Start Free Trial